SENATE, No. 1892

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

217th LEGISLATURE

 

INTRODUCED MARCH 10, 2016

 


 

Sponsored by:

Senator  MICHAEL J. DOHERTY

District 23 (Hunterdon, Somerset and Warren)

Senator  DIANE B. ALLEN

District 7 (Burlington)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Prohibits use of body imaging scanners to screen passengers and airline crew members.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

  


An Act concerning body imaging scanners in airports and supplementing Titles 27 and 32 of the Revised Statutes.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.    a.  The use of body imaging scanning equipment in an airport operated by the South Jersey Transportation Authority to screen passengers and airline pilots and crew members is prohibited in this State.

     b.    Any person who operates body imaging scanning equipment in direct contact with a passenger, pilot, or crew member, or who remotely views images from the equipment, shall be liable for a civil penalty of $1,000 for each occurrence.  A municipal court shall have jurisdiction over proceedings to enforce and collect any penalty imposed because of a violation of this section, if the violation has occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.  The proceedings shall be summary and in accordance with the "Penalty Enforcement Law of 1999," P.L.1999, c.274 (C.2A:58-10 et seq.).  Process shall be in the nature of a summons or warrant and shall issue only upon the complaint of the Attorney General, or the law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction.  The penalty recovered shall be paid by the Attorney General or law enforcement agency into the treasury of the State. 

     c.     No local, State, or federal government employee shall have immunity from any civil liability resulting from the operation of such body imaging scanning equipment, even if the violation occurred while acting within the scope of employment.

     d.    As used in this section, “body imaging scanning equipment” includes, but is not limited to, equipment that uses backscatter technology or millimeter wave technology.

 

     2.    a.  The use of body imaging scanning equipment in an airport operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to screen passengers and airline pilots and crew members is prohibited in this State.

     b.    Any person who operates body imaging scanning equipment in direct contact with a passenger, pilot, or crew member, or who remotely views images from the equipment, shall be liable for a civil penalty of $1,000 for each occurrence.  A municipal court shall have jurisdiction over proceedings to enforce and collect any penalty imposed because of a violation of this section, if the violation has occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.  The proceedings shall be summary and in accordance with the "Penalty Enforcement Law of 1999," P.L.1999, c.274 (C.2A:58-10 et seq.).  Process shall be in the nature of a summons or warrant and shall issue only upon the complaint of the Attorney General, or the law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction.  The penalty recovered shall be paid by the Attorney General or law enforcement agency into the treasury of the State.

     c.     No local, State, or federal government employee shall have immunity from any civil liability resulting from the operation of such body imaging scanning equipment, even if the violation occurred while acting within the scope of employment.

     d.    As used in this section, “body imaging scanning equipment” includes, but is not limited to, equipment that uses backscatter technology or millimeter wave technology.

 

     3.    Section 1 of this act shall take effect immediately; section 2 of this act shall take effect upon the enactment into law by the State of New York of legislation having a substantially identical effect with this act, but if the State of New York shall have already enacted such legislation, this act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill prohibits the use of body imaging scanning equipment in airports to screen passengers, airline pilots, and crew members.  The provisions of the bill apply to Atlantic City International Airport, which is operated by the South Jersey Transportation Authority, and to Newark Liberty International Airport and Teterboro Airport, which are operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

     The bill specifically provides that any person who operates body imaging scanning equipment in direct contact with a passenger, pilot, or crew member, or remotely views images from the equipment, will be liable for a civil penalty of $1,000 for each occurrence.  Body imaging scanning equipment includes, but is not limited to, equipment that uses backscatter technology or millimeter wave technology.

     A municipal court will have jurisdiction over proceedings to enforce and collect any penalty imposed because of a violation of this bill, if the violation has occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of the court.  Process is to be in the nature of a summons or warrant, and is to issue only upon the complaint of the Attorney General, or the law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction.  The penalty is to be sued for and recovered in a summary manner and is to be paid into the treasury of the State.

     No local, State, or federal government employee will have immunity from any civil liability resulting from the operation of body imaging scanning equipment, even if the violation occurred while acting within the scope of employment.

     The bill will take effect immediately; however, because the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is an interstate authority, the provisions affecting the airports operated by the authority will not become effective until such time as New York State enacts similar legislation.

     This bill is in response to the recently implemented policy of the federal Transportation Security Administration to employ advanced imaging technology in major airports in the country to screen air travelers for both metallic and non-metallic threats that may be concealed under a person’s clothing.  Many members of the public have raised concerns that the use of the imaging equipment unnecessarily exposes travelers to radiation and the images produced constitute an invasion of a person’s privacy.

     This bill is part of a package of three bills designed by the sponsor to protect the privacy of the traveling public.