ASSEMBLY, No. 4174

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

221st LEGISLATURE

 

INTRODUCED APRIL 11, 2024

 


 

Sponsored by:

Assemblywoman  LUANNE M. PETERPAUL

District 11 (Monmouth)

Assemblywoman  JESSICA RAMIREZ

District 32 (Hudson)

Assemblywoman  HEATHER SIMMONS

District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Clarifies consent to being photographed, filmed, or recorded in a sexual manner does not include or imply consent to disclosure of image.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

  


An Act concerning invasion of privacy and amending P.L.2003, c.206.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.  Section 1 of P.L.2003, c.206 (C.2C:14-9) is amended to read as follows:

     1.  a.  An actor commits a crime of the fourth degree if, knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, and under circumstances in which a reasonable person would know that another may expose intimate parts or may engage in sexual penetration or sexual contact, he observes another person without that person’s consent and under circumstances in which a reasonable person would not expect to be observed.

     b.  (1)  An actor commits a crime of the third degree if, knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, he photographs, films, videotapes, records, or otherwise reproduces in any manner, the image of another person whose intimate parts are exposed or who is engaged in an act of sexual penetration or sexual contact, without that person’s consent and under circumstances in which a reasonable person would not expect to be observed.

     (2)   An actor commits a crime of the fourth degree if, knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, he photographs, films, videotapes, records, or otherwise reproduces in any manner, the image of the undergarment-clad intimate parts of another person, without that person’s consent and under circumstances in which a reasonable person would not expect to have his undergarment-clad intimate parts observed.

     c.     An actor commits a crime of the third degree if, knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, he discloses any photograph, film, videotape, recording or any other reproduction of the image, taken [in violation of subsection b. of this section,] of: (1) another person who is engaged in an act of sexual penetration or sexual contact; (2) another person whose intimate parts are exposed; or (3) another person’s undergarment-clad intimate parts, unless that person has consented to such disclosure.

     For purposes of this subsection, a person’s consent to being photographed, filmed, videotaped, recorded, observed, or otherwise having their image reproduced shall not be construed to include or imply the person’s consent to the disclosure of such image.  A person’s consent to disclosure shall be strictly construed to be limited only to the express purpose for which consent was obtained.

     For purposes of this subsection: (1) “disclose” means sell, manufacture, give, provide, lend, trade, mail, deliver, transfer, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, advertise, offer, share, or make available via the Internet or by any other means, whether for pecuniary gain or not; and (2) “intimate parts” has the meaning ascribed to it in N.J.S.2C:14-1.  Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:43-3, a fine not to exceed $30,000 may be imposed for a violation of this subsection.

     d.    It is an affirmative defense to a crime under this section that:

     (1)   the actor posted or otherwise provided prior notice to the person of the actor’s intent to engage in the conduct specified in subsection a., b., or c., and

     (2)   the actor acted with a lawful purpose.

     e.  (1)  It shall not be a violation of subsection a. or b. to observe another person in the access way, foyer or entrance to a fitting room or dressing room operated by a retail establishment or to photograph, film, videotape, record or otherwise reproduce the image of such person, if the actor conspicuously posts at the entrance to the fitting room or dressing room prior notice of his intent to make the observations, photographs, films, videotapes, recordings or other reproductions.

     (2)   It shall be a violation of subsection c. to disclose in any manner any such photograph, film, videotape or recording of another person using a fitting room or dressing room except under the following circumstances:

     (a)   to law enforcement officers in connection with a criminal prosecution;

     (b)   pursuant to subpoena or court order for use in a legal proceeding; or

     (c)   to a co-worker, manager or supervisor acting within the scope of his employment.

     f.     It shall be a violation of subsection a. or b. to observe another person in a private dressing stall of a fitting room or dressing room operated by a retail establishment or to photograph, film, videotape, record or otherwise reproduce the image of another person in a private dressing stall of a fitting room or dressing room.

     g.    For purposes of this act, a law enforcement officer, or a corrections officer or guard in a correctional facility or jail, who is engaged in the official performance of his duties shall be deemed to be licensed or privileged to make and to disclose observations, photographs, films, videotapes, recordings or any other reproductions.

     h.    Notwithstanding the provisions of N.J.S.2C:1-8 or any other provisions of law, a conviction arising under subsection b. of this section shall not merge with a conviction under subsection c. of this section, nor shall a conviction under subsection c. merge with a conviction under subsection b.

(cf: P.L.2016, c.2, s.1)

     2.  This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill amends the invasion of privacy statute, N.J.S.A.2C:14-9, to clarify that a person’s consent to being photographed, filmed, videotaped, recorded, observed, or otherwise having their nude, sexual, or sexually suggestive image reproduced is not be construed to include or imply the person’s consent to the disclosure of such image.  The bill also requires that a person’s consent to disclosure is strictly construed to be limited only to the express purpose for which consent was obtained.

     Under current law, a person’s consent to the taking of the image could be construed to also waive any restriction on the subsequent disclosure of the image.  Under the bill, taking an image and disclosing an image are two separate acts that require two separate instances of consent.